You are viewing [info]j_riley's journal

Jack Riley

The Independent has permanently moved its blogs. Read new blogs by Jack here.
Follow on Twitter - Website

Previous Entry | Next Entry


Barack Obama, bad boyfriend

Posted by Jack Riley
  • Monday, 17 November 2008 at 01:24 pm
After making him the most popular user in the (admittedly short) history of the site, Barack's 132,101 Twitter followers must feel like a girl with burnt fingers; attentive, communicative and committed, he was everything you could wish for until he got what he wanted, and then... nothing. He never calls, he never 'tweets'. Since November 5th, on Twitter at least, there has been complete radio silence from Obama, save for one sugary, insubstantial victory update. It's enough to break a hopeful electorate's heart.
In reality, there's every chance the Twitter entries were being posted by some spotty volunteer in Tucson (now frantically trying to catch up on all the college work he missed) rather than the sharp-suited man himself. Great monuments to the enthusiasm of campaigners for both sides now dot the electronic landscape unfrequented. The vast amount of election detritus cluttering up the internet is a testament to the sheer amount of organised effort that went into e-electioneering during this campaign, and while Obama's YouTube channel looks like it may see some use over the next few years, many parts of the online push are now essentially virtual boarded-up shops.

The problem isn't restricted to candidate-sanctioned operations. News aggregation sites who got caught up in the hysteria have seemed rudderless in the days following November 4th; and they grew so much and so fast during the course of the campaign that many users won't remember a time before election fever took hold. It'll be news to them that long before articles about Norwegian women Barack helped out in the 1980s were the top stories on Digg and Reddit, people were voting for LOLcats in their thousands to make them more prominent than articles about real news. For now, at least, it's a retreat from the political, and back to the wonderful, warped, geeky collection of links, pictures and videos which constitutes many people's experience of news on the web. But it doesn't have to be this way...

Comments

[info]oceanleopard wrote:
Thursday, 27 November 2008 at 12:00 pm (UTC)
The saddest truth is those groups of people holding signs at street corners are paid to stand there - not volunteers, and most don't even truly support that particular politician. It's a real shame to see the people (for lack of a more accurate analogy) still believe in Santa.

...and since it is so very similar, I have to say I'm a hair disappointed in these "journals by journalists." Personally, I have always hoped for a real inside perspective - what goes on working from day to day. I realize this is a particularly touchy subject in the UK, but it isn't just your paper's journals which disappoint.

Of course I can pass it off as getting used to the format, and you're perhaps a bit disgruntled about doing "more work for the same pay." Who knows - I have no clue what is going through your head about this whole process, and that is exactly what I would love to know most of all.
[info]j_riley wrote:
Thursday, 27 November 2008 at 01:34 pm (UTC)

I'm not sure I agree with you - you only have to recall the scenes of jubilation in Times Square on election night to confirm the breadth and depth of goodwill Barack Obama inspired in many Americans, almost none of whom were paid.

On the issue of the new journals, what kind of content would you like to see? Sad to say, but the daily lives of most journalists are much less interesting than you might realise. For an insider view though, Andrew Grice is fantastic on politics, and Ali Sheikholeslami posts really interesting stuff from Iran - and you can't get much more of an inside perspective than that.

[info]oceanleopard wrote:
Thursday, 27 November 2008 at 01:59 pm (UTC)
Certainly the masses who congregate to cheer on a victory aren't paid (or at least I should hope so) - I'm referring to the groups with bull horns and big signs urging people to vote for the candidate. Not all of these groups are paid, but if you look close enough, you can tell the difference. There's plenty of this sort of thing in every campaign, and to be completely honest, I'm completely baffled as to why any politician would hire these sorts of groups - unless they are trying to capitalize on the fools who vote to be on a bandwagon... but I digress.

You can say your day-to-day lives are boring until you're blue in the face, but I won't believe it. I'm just a work-at-home freelancer and every person I've encountered absolutely has to know every detail. They may not realize it yet, but they want to know what it's like to evaluate a possible next step in their career - and that is very much along the lines of my reasoning too.

If I had known then what I know now, I might have been able to avoid some of the bigger bumps in the road. I don't have any close personal friends in the field, so I am petrified of not knowing what I am getting myself into. Although I have trucked on through these last 3 years, I still have a bit of "glass ceiling fear" because I don't completely understand what would be expected of me, provided to me, or conned from me - be it material or simply mental.

Take for instance, I had no idea how much I would have to change what I value. In a typical working environment, if you do a good job you can pretty much expect that someone will praise you for it or notice. Working from home as a freelancer is lonely to begin with - then you have to factor in the absolute lack of praise. Getting paid is your only thank-you. I didn't understand why I was so disgruntled about "living my dream" until I sat down to really think about it and re-evaluate what I value and appreciate in my work - which became, quite simply, the quality of my work.

And, no offense to your colleagues, but I don't follow politics through media. It's just not my cup of tea.